Rorschach ink stains stimulus material. How the Rorschach test works. Rorschach ink test

Rorschach test spots are known to many today. Its creator died very early, at the age of 37. He never saw much success for the psychological tool he invented ...

The Rorschach test is based on showing 10 of five black and white, three color and two black and red. The psychologist, in strict order, shows the cards, asking the patient the question: "What is it like?" Then, after the patient has given the answers to the Rorschach test, the specialist again suggests looking at the cards, again in a certain sequence. The subject is asked to name everything that he could see on them, as well as where in the picture he saw this or that image, and what makes the patient give this very answer. Can be tilted, overturned Rorschach dough stains. You can manipulate them in all sorts of ways. At the same time, the psychologist conducting the Rorschach test accurately records everything that the patient does and says during the test and during each answer. After that, the points are calculated, the answers are analyzed. Then, using mathematical calculations, the result is obtained.

The Rorschach test is interpreted by a specialist. If in a person any ink stain does not cause any associations, and he cannot say what he sees on it, this may mean that the object depicted on the card is blocked in his mind, or that the corresponding image is connected in the subconscious of the subject with a topic that he would not like to discuss at the moment. As you can see, it is not at all difficult to pass the Rorschach test, but it is difficult to do it yourself. It is better to contact a psychologist for this. You can pass the Rorschach test yourself, but only a specialist can correctly interpret the results. However, you can use it to assess a person's personality in general terms.

First card

It shows a smudge of black ink. This card is shown first when the blot test is performed. The answer received allows us to assume how a person performs tasks that are new to him, and therefore related to stress. People usually say that this image looks like a butterfly, moth, or the face of an animal (rabbit, elephant, etc.). The answer to the question reflects the type as a whole.

For some, the image of a bat is associated with something unpleasant, while for others it is a symbol of rebirth, as well as the ability to navigate in the dark. Transformation and transition can symbolize butterflies, as well as the ability to overcome difficulties, change, grow. A moth signifies a feeling of ugliness and abandonment, as well as anxiety and weakness. The muzzle of an animal (such as an elephant) symbolizes the ways in which we confront difficulties, as well as fear of our inner problems. It can also mean a feeling of discomfort, talk about a problem that the respondent is currently trying to get rid of.

Second card

It shows a red and black spot. Often people see something sexy on this card. The red color in the image is usually interpreted as blood, the reaction to which shows how a person can manage his anger and feelings. Most often, respondents answer that this spot resembles two people, an act of pleading, a person looking in a mirror or a long-legged animal, for example, a bear, dog or elephant.

In the event that a person sees two people in the spot, this may indicate interdependence, an ambivalent attitude towards sexual intercourse, an obsession with sex, or focus on close relationships and communication with others. If it resembles a person reflecting in a mirror, this indicates self-centeredness or a tendency to self-criticism. If the respondent sees a dog, then he is a loving and faithful friend. If this stain is perceived as something negative, it means that the person needs to face their fears. If it resembles an elephant, the possible interpretations are: a developed intellect, a tendency to think, a good memory. Sometimes, however, such a vision indicates a negative perception of the respondent's body. Bear means disobedience, independence, rivalry, aggression. The stain reminds of the sexual, so if a person sees a person praying, this speaks of an attitude towards sex in a religious context. If at the same time he notices blood, it means that he associates physical pain with religion or resorts to prayer, experiencing complex emotions (for example, anger), etc.

Third card

On it we see a stain of black and red ink. Perception of it speaks about the relationship of a person to others in the framework of interaction. The respondents most often see the image of two people, a person looking in a mirror, a moth or a butterfly. If a person notices two diners, then he is leading an active social life. If the stain resembles two people washing their hands, this indicates a feeling of uncleanness, insecurity, or paranoid fear. If the respondent saw in him two people who are playing a game, it is often noted that in social interactions he takes the position of a rival. If the subject notices a person who looks at his reflection in the mirror, it is possible that he is inattentive to others, egocentric, unable to understand people.

Fourth card

Let's continue to describe the Rorschach spots. The 4th card is called "paternal". On it we see a black spot and some blurry fuzzy parts of it. Many people talk about something terrifying and big. The reaction to this spot can reveal the respondent's attitude to authorities, as well as the peculiarities of his upbringing. It most often resembles a huge animal or its burrow or skin, or a monster.

If a person sees a monster or a large animal, this indicates admiration for authorities and a feeling of inferiority, an exaggerated fear of those in power, including his own father. The skin of the animal often symbolizes the respondent's strong inner discomfort when discussing topics related to the father. But it may also indicate that the problem of admiration for authorities or his inferiority is irrelevant for him.

Fifth card

This is a black spot. The association he called displays, as on the first card, the true "I". People usually do not feel threatened when looking at an image. If the image that the respondent saw differs significantly from the answer received at the sight of the 1st card, this indicates that, most likely, the Rorschach spots - from 2 to 4 - made a great impression on this person. The image most often resembles a bat, moth, or butterfly.

Sixth card

The image on it is also black and monochrome. This card is distinguished by the texture of the spot. In humans, the image on it evokes associations with intimacy, and therefore it is called a "sex card". The respondents most often note that the stain resembles an animal's skin or a burrow. This can mean a reluctance to enter into close relationships with other people and, as a result, a feeling of isolation from society and inner emptiness.

Seventh card

On this card, the spot is also black. Usually, the respondents associate it with the feminine principle. Most often, people see in him the images of children and women. If a person finds it difficult to describe what is depicted, this may indicate that he has difficult relationships with women. Often respondents note that the stain resembles the faces or heads of women and children. It can also remind you of a kiss. The heads of women indicate the feelings associated with the mother, affecting the attitude towards women in general. Children's heads mean an attitude towards childhood, the need to take care of a child living in a person's soul. Heads bowed for a kiss signifies the desire to be loved, as well as to be reunited with the mother.

Eighth card

It has pink, gray, blue and orange colors. This is the first multi-color card in the test and is especially difficult to interpret. If, when demonstrating it, the respondent feels discomfort, it is likely that he has difficulty handling complex emotional stimuli or situations. People most often report seeing a butterfly, a four-legged animal, or a moth.

Ninth card

The spot on it includes pink, green and orange colors and has a vague outline. Most people find it difficult to determine what a given image resembles. Therefore, the card can assess how a person copes with uncertainty and lack of a clear structure. Patients most often see a general outline of a person or an undefined form of evil. If the respondent sees a person, then the feelings experienced at the same time indicate how successfully he can cope with the disorganization of information and time. An abstract image of evil can symbolize that a person needs a clear schedule in order to feel comfortable in life, and he does not cope well with uncertainty.

Tenth card

Rorschach's psychological test ends with a 10th card. It has the most colors: yellow, orange, pink, green, blue, and gray. This card resembles the 8th in shape, and the 9th in complexity. At the sight of her, many have pleasant feelings, except for those who are puzzled by the difficulty of determining the image depicted on the 9th card, which the Rorschach test suggests. Interpretation is most often as follows: spider, lobster, crab, rabbit head, caterpillar or snake. Crab means a tendency to get attached to things and people, or tolerance. Lobster testifies to tolerance, strength, ability to cope with problems, fear of harming oneself or fear of harm from another. A spider can mean fear, a feeling that the respondent has been tricked or forced into a difficult situation. The rabbit's head speaks of a positive attitude towards life and reproductive ability. Snakes - a sense of danger, fear of the unknown, a feeling that a person has been deceived. In addition, they can mean forbidden or unacceptable sexual desires. Caterpillars testify to the understanding that people are constantly evolving and changing, talking about the prospects for growth.

So, we have briefly described the Rorschach test. It is not easy to interpret the results on your own - a good knowledge of psychology is required. However, in general terms, you can get an idea of ​​the person based on this test.

Don't lose it. Subscribe and receive a link to the article in your mail.

The Rorschach test or the Rorschach inkblot technique is one of the most famous psychodiagnostic tests. Each of us has seen at least one picture with blots that resemble ... And here, in fact, it begins, since the answer determines the individual properties and inclinations of a particular person. Recently, due to its massive distribution on social networks, the Rorschach test is often presented in significantly simplified versions, but in fact it is a powerful psychological tool. In this article, we tried to talk about him without confusing scientific terminology and, moreover, wrote an online test based on the inkblot technique, the passage of which will allow you to determine the properties of your personality.

How the test was created

To say unequivocally how the Swiss psychiatrist and psychologist Hermann Rorschach came up with the idea of ​​creating such a test is a very difficult task. PhD Jane Framingham, for example, believes that this idea could have been prompted by the popular at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries children's game "Klecksographie" - charades based on ink blots. Blots as a psychological tool could be used by Rorschach's teacher and friend Konrad Goering.

The history of the test itself can be started from 1911, when E. Bleuler first introduced the term "schizophrenia" into scientific use, and G. Rorschach became interested in this disease and devoted his dissertation to studying it. During the experimental part, he noticed that patients interpret the spots from the Klecksographie game differently. But then he made only a small report on his observation.

This was followed by several years of practice, during which G. Rorschach actively tested the ink-blot technique on his patients in order to determine personal behavioral factors. As a result, 40 cards with ink spots were created and theoretical material was collected to present the methodology. But there were difficulties with the publication. It's hard to believe now, but not a single publishing house of that time wanted to take on the printing of Rorschach's book. And the reason for this was not the fantastic or unscientific nature of his ideas, but the banal technical difficulty in printing so many drawings of blots. As a result, they had to be reduced first to 15, and then to 10. Only after that one of the publishers agreed to publish the book. It came out in 1921 under the name Psychodiagnostik.

In it, in addition to introducing the concept of "psychodiagnostics" into science, the results of research with ink spots and the test itself with explanations were presented. The scoring system of Rorschach himself (in other words, explanations of how to interpret the results obtained) focused on the classification of possible answers, and paid minimal attention to their content. The author of the test died the following year. Despite the weakness of certain aspects of the test (it is unclear to which category of the proposed classification all possible answer options should be attributed due to the lack of their description in the work), its developments were very highly valued for a long time and were the main diagnostic tools in clinical psychology (for 40-50 x years of the twentieth century). In the 1960s, the Rorschach test was criticized, mainly due to the lack of a single methodology for assessing responses (there are several most common scoring systems: Beck, Piotrovsky, Klopfer, etc.).

Tests that are used in world practice, with a detailed interpretation of their results for the needs of self-development, are collected. Take the course to understand yourself and your true motives.

But complete discrediting was avoided. Mainly thanks to the writings of John Exner. He compared the 5 dominant grading systems and created something like a unifying system ("The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System"). Today, many psychologists use the Rorschach test precisely within the framework of the Exner Integrative System. It is used for diagnostics in correctional institutions in the United States and some other countries, in forensics, for diagnosing personality disorders in clinical psychology. Also, the test reveals validity in understanding the personality and emotional state of a person in cases where the patient does not want or cannot (due to dementia, for example, as in the case of Charlie Gordon in "Flowers for Algernon") to speak about it directly. Globally, based on the answers, one can judge a person, understand his past and predict future behavior.

Testing and results

The stimulus material for the Rorschach test is 10 cards with symmetrical images, which are created by ink spots that bear little resemblance to the outlines of anything specific. Half of the cards are colored, half are black and white. The subject's task is to tell and detail what he sees in the picture. The test time is unlimited.

A person who is not familiar with the nuances of psychodiagnostics can assume that he is involved in the process of describing the image. In fact, our imagination only decorates the answer, but the very search for it is dictated by other mechanisms, not related to fantasy. Rorschach was sure that the images that each person sees in ink blots are dictated by individual characteristics and personality traits. At first glance, it seems that to discern something in a blot is not a particularly difficult task - just fantasize as much as you want. But our brain in this case does a rather difficult job.

Its starting point is the lack of even the slightest idea of ​​what is depicted on the card. This uncertainty triggers where the images that have arisen belong to the sphere of the conscious only partially. A series of such associations are combined into more complex images, and on their basis the imagination completes the formation of a complex representation. Such a chain of mental acts makes it possible to identify those psychological characteristics that determine the individuality of each person. This is the main difference between the Rorschach test and other projective tests (tests where latent emotions or internal conflicts are determined through the response to ambiguous stimuli projected onto the participant during testing). Its stimulus material is "pure" - the proposed pictures are formless and indefinite, which excludes any external orientation of the associations.

After the subject finishes working with ink blots, his answers are assessed in terms of two characteristics: formal and content. Formal assessment is based on the characteristics of the organization of perception. The analysis in this case can be based on the following aspects:

• Operating with an image in space (the whole spot or part is used);
• Selectivity of perception (strong reaction to color or predominantly reaction to color);
• Dynamism or immobility of images;
• The sequence of reactions.

The way to process and interpret even the most common answers for each of these two classes of ratings is a detailed and very complex process. Therefore, if you are interested in this topic, you can get acquainted with the relevant material by the link.

Below we propose to pass our version of the Rorschach test with automatic interpretation, which, of course, is inferior to the interpretation of a real specialist in psychology and psychotherapy, but still will help you try to recognize yourself through the prism of the famous blots.

The Rorschach inkblot test as a psychodiagnostic technique has one of the most dramatic stories of formation and recognition. In 1911-21, the test was developed as a method for the differential diagnosis of schizophrenia. In the 40-50s, the Rorschach Test was firmly in the lead among projective methods. And in the 60s it was criticized and almost discredited.

Today, the Rorschach test is one of the most informative methods of objective psychological diagnostics. Abroad, the Rorschach test is used in most cases within the Exner Comprehensive System. Within the framework of this system, the Rorschach test becomes a powerful standardized method for obtaining versatile accurate information about various aspects of human mental activity.

In Russia, until recently, the Rorschach test is known from the standpoint of the seventies of the twentieth century. The methodology was considered and used mainly on the basis of an eclectic approach, including certain provisions borrowed from various approaches to this test, which were formed before 1960.

Since the mid-2000s, specialists who have been trained in accordance with international standards of a modern approach to the Rorschach test based on the Integrative System began to appear in Russia.

Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach noticed that some characteristics of the subjects' responses are dependent on certain behavioral characteristics. Rorschach's concept was that he focused on the processes of recognizing certain objects in the perception of spots. It was the manifestations of impaired perception in the responses of mentally ill people that were the criteria for differentiating them from the responses of healthy people. The peculiarities of the subject's perception manifested themselves not so much in the content of the answer as in its formal characteristics. These characteristics included the localization of the object named by the subject in the spot, as well as those features of the spots themselves, which were chosen by the surveyed to form a response.

Rorschach's stimulus stains, unlike other inkblots used at the time, were not completely amorphous. He deliberately made some areas of the spots more defined along the contours, so that they resemble completely specific objects. Rorschach suggested that if mentally ill people distortedly perceive well-known objects, then they will also give completely different answers when identifying precisely those areas of the spot that had more definite contours. This idea later became the basis for a theoretical conceptual substantiation of the psychodiagnostic nature of the Rorschach test. In 1922, 7 months after the test was published, Rorschach died suddenly of peritonitis.

Beginning in the 1930s, interest in the technique began to grow, and the test began to gain popularity in the United States. Gradually, 5 main approaches to the use of the Rorschach test were formed. The first two approaches were created by S. Beck and M. Gertz, who adhered to the traditional Rorschach view of this technique. The main importance these researchers attached to the standardization of testing and data collection by the Rorschach method. B. Klopfer's approach was based on a psychoanalytic interpretation of the formal characteristics of the subject's response. The system of Z. Piotrovsky was focused on the study by the Rorschach method of neurological patients with organic pathology of the brain. The psychoanalytic ideas of D. Rapaport regarding the Rorschach test were developed by R. Schafer, who presented the first attempt to interpret the content of answers from the point of view of psychodynamics of the subject's personality. The most prominent scientist who worked with the Rorschach test in Europe was E. Bohm, but in the 70s the further systematic development of the European school on the use of the Rorschach test practically stopped.

The use of projective tests is based on the assumption that the subject's reactions to a poorly structured stimulus material reflect his internal psychological organization, needs, ulterior motives, feelings, conflicts and complexes. The disadvantages of projective tests are insufficient compliance with psychometric requirements, subjectivism of interpretation, and frequent errors in the illusory correlation of test indicators with psychological characteristics.

The Rorschach test, it would seem, meets all the criteria of a projective test: the uncertainty and ambiguity of the stimulus material, free instruction and the absence of restrictions on the number of answers. However, initially this method was not intended for projective psychodynamic diagnostics.

Opponents of the test, without considering the existence of five main approaches, often used conflicting publications to discredit the test itself.

Modern developments of this test based on the Integrative System show that the projective capabilities of the Rorschach test are not its main diagnostic value.

The rapid decline in research in the 60s and 70s was due to differences in views on the nature of the test and the lack of a unified approach to its use. The development of the test has come to a standstill, because no comparative studies of established approaches have been conducted.

In 1961, D. Exner, who initially worked under the direction of S. Beck, first published his comparative studies of the Beck and Klopfer systems. Then, over the course of seven years, D. Exner conducted a comprehensive analysis of a huge amount of contradictory literature on the main approaches to the test. As a result, it was found that all approaches differ significantly from each other, and the differences extend to all aspects of test use. We can say that at that time there was not one Rorschach Test, but five.

To find out which of the approaches to the Rorschach test is the most empirically reliable and most effective when used in a clinic in 1968 in the United States under the leadership of John Exner, the Research Center "Rorschach Research Foundation" was organized. During the first 2 years of its existence, the Research Center was engaged in direct collection of data for direct comparison of five known systems. The main goal of the project was to standardize testing and data processing techniques. All components of the test were subjected to psychometric analysis with confirmation of validity, calculation of reliability coefficients and creation of a regulatory framework.

The normative base, on the basis of which the normative ranges of the scale values ​​are compiled, is regularly updated and consists of 700 healthy adults and 1400 children and adolescents aged 5-16 years. The first version of the new system was released in 1974 under the name "Comprehensive System".
Thus, on the basis of the Integrative System, the method proposed by Hermann Rorschach turned from an experiment into a psychological test that meets the basic psychometric requirements. However, the development of the integrative approach did not stop there.

In the late 70s, the Center conducted research on the cognitive processes of perceiving stimuli from the Rorschach test during a latent reaction preceding the verbalization of the response. The results of these studies translated the Integrative System onto a conceptual basis and made it possible to explain the unique psychodiagnostic capabilities of the Rorschach test from the point of view of the psychology of problem-solving behavior and pattern recognition. In recent years, the main attention in the development of the System has been directed to the development of clear strategies and algorithms for interpretation in accordance with key variables.

The Integrative System has been successfully tested not only in the USA, Spain, Finland, Peru, France, Belgium, Japan, etc. The success of testing this system in various countries is due to the fact that the variables of the Integrative System objectively reflect universal, culturally independent, formal characteristics human behavior.

Back in 1921, a psychiatrist and psychologist from Switzerland, Hermann Rorschach, created a personality research test named after him - Rorschach test, also known under the names: "Spots or blots of Rorschach", as well as, "the technique of ink blots", which is still quite in demand and popular among psychologists and psychotherapists in the diagnosis of the psyche, its disorders and disorders.

The very term "Psychodiagnostics" was also introduced into circulation by Rorschach.

The stimulus material of the Rorschach projective test consists of 10 amorphous (weakly structured) black-and-white and color pictures, the so-called. Rorschach spots, symmetric along the axis and located in a certain order from 1 to 10.

Rorschach test pass online

Rorschach test pass online it is possible only in a truncated form, since to get real psychodiagnostic results, an examination is necessary in the presence of a psychologist, and even in conjunction with others, including clinical studies and interviewing the subject. In this case, the person being tested, looking at an image, a Rorschach spot, uses free associations and says the first thing that comes to mind: a word, an image, a representation ...

What a person "sees" in a blot (ink blot) will help determine the characteristics of his personality and psyche - the norm and deviations, up to personal, neurotic disorders and pathology.

So, Rorschach test online, pass for free

Now, if you are ready, you can go Rorschach test online, free in a truncated version ...
You are invited to answer the questions about what, in your opinion, each picture, the Rorschach blot, looks like.

Attention! For the purity of the research with the Rorschach test, first, in order, look at each blot and, based on personal associations, tell yourself (preferably write down) what comes to your mind: what does the Rorschach spot remind you of, what it looks like ...
Then, at the end of the content (page), select the definitions suitable for your associations by the number of each blob. Click on the result button and find out a lot about your personality.

Those who wish to pass the famous Rorschach test with the participation of a psychologist, for example, via Skype, and receive the most reliable personality studies in conjunction with psychoanalysis, can SIGN UP for online psychodiagnostics from the main page of the site.

Rorschach inkblot technique - take the test

Blot number 1

Blot number 2


Blot number 3


Blot No. 4


Blot No. 5


Blot number 6


Blot number 7


Blot number 8


Blot number 9


Blot No. 10

The Rorschach test is one of the most famous, widely used and objective projective techniques.

G. Rorschach's ink stain technique is used to diagnose the properties and qualities of a person. This technique serves as one of the best indicators of those personality traits that are manifested in synthetic activity under conditions of undirected association. That is, testing is based on the analysis of creative products, which reflect (project) some individual characteristics of a person.

This projective technique for the study of personality was created by Hermann Rorschach in 1921.

The stimulus material for the test consists of 10 standard tables with black and white and color symmetrical images that bear little resemblance to something specific. The test taker is asked to answer the question of what, in his opinion, each image looks like.

Rorschach test. Ink stain technique:

Instruction.

Look in turn at the proposed pictures and answer the following questions for each of them.

What does this stain look like? Indicate what you see on it: in whole or in parts. What does a spot resemble in shape or color, is it static or is it moving?

The viewing time for each drawing is not limited. Having finished with one drawing, move on to another, memorizing or recording your answer.

Incentive material for the Rorschach method.

The key to the Rorschach test.

Rorschach uses the sphere of perception as an objective basis for identifying specific personal qualities. On the basis of the individual construction of the image, he develops his own system of personality diagnostics. The researcher believes that individual personality traits and qualities are behind the individual characteristics of the construction of representations. In his opinion, information about individual qualities is provided by selectivity in perception, and the method of subsequent integration of selected elements into a particular image, and the content of the image itself.

Thus, the subject must see in each indefinite spot (or group of spots) a certain object, image or picture, which are further considered as projections of individual qualities of his personality.

It is assumed that a number of mental acts and those mental characteristics of a person that bear the most striking imprint of individuality are involved in the creation of such an image or a detailed picture. First of all, it is the selectivity of perception, the peculiarities of the course of associative processes and the peculiarities of the attitude. From the moment the spot is presented to the creation of the image, an interconnected chain of processes arises. First of all, the very uncertainty of the spot gives an impetus to associations that are only partially realized. The vague associations that have arisen are combined into complex images. Finally, the defined image gives a new direction to associations, as a result of which complete, logical, grounded pictures are created.

This is the basic scheme of the Rorschach test, which distinguishes it from other projective tests in terms of system and structure in projection. By the nature of the projection, by its type, the Rorschach test is considered the cleanest test, independent of external influences. It is assumed that the uncertainty and formlessness of the spot (unconstructed stimulus) excludes the external objective orientation of the associations leading to the creation of an image - a picture. Therefore, the features of projections according to the Rorschach test are attributed exclusively to subjective factors.

The material obtained by the Rorschach test is assessed sequentially by two types of assessments (characteristics): formal assessment and content assessment. Formal assessments are based on an analysis of the peculiarities of the organization of perception, assessments in terms of content - on the analysis of the material of specific associations.

The principle of separate assessments plays an essential role in personality diagnostics, since for each of them there is a different mechanism that forms the answer. Therefore, one and the same answer should be consistently evaluated both from the formal and the substantive side.

According to formal estimates, the answers reflect one of the following features of the organization of perception:

a) the peculiarities of operation and orientation in space (in one case, the entire spot is taken to build the image as a whole, in the other - only a part of it);
b) selectivity of reactions (for example, an extremely strong reaction to color or mainly to color);
c) the order of the reaction (for example, a reaction consisting of a number of categories always begins with a form);
d) static or dynamism is either motionless, or movement is seen in the pictures).

Content assessments fall into one of four categories - people, animals, objects and fantastic images - and testify to those features of the associative process, as a result of the manifestation of which, based on the action of prevailing ideas and concepts, one of the typical images is formed. Separate relationships between the categories of answers and their diagnostic values ​​(according to formal estimates and estimates by content) are summarized in the tables below.

Explanations for the encryption of answers in the study according to the Rorschach test (types of answers).

Formal characteristics

C (integrity) - this is how the answers based on the perception of the entire spot of the table as a whole are encrypted, with a clear limitation of the spot from the background of the tables.
D (detail) - answers based on the perception of a part of the spot without taking into account its other parts.
F (form) - a clearly expressed form (description of people, animals, plants, etc.).
Fn is an indistinctly perceived form.
ФЦВ (form-color) - answers in which form prevails and color is mentioned.
Tsvf (color-form) - answers in which color predominates, but form is also mentioned.

Content characteristics

F - category "animals". Mention is introduced here of any representatives of the animal world - mammals, birds, fish, amphibians, reptiles, insects.
H - category "human figures". Mentions about human beings in any form - by the naming of gender (man, woman, little girl, boys), age (old man, old woman, young man); profession (blacksmith, ballerina); with a pronoun (someone bent over, dancing here) or a participle (working, fighting, pointing); with a gang (fight, demonstration, auditorium full of audience).
P - category "items". Mention of items for any purpose, size, property, material, position.
Fan - the category of "fantastic images" - fantastic creatures mentioned by the subjects, etc. (witch, sorcerer, centaurs, king of the underworld).
Dv - category "movement". Includes movement, posture movement, sometimes foreshortening, state, less often - facial movements.

Processing of results

1. All responses are encrypted (see encryption above and the table below).
2. The number of answers of different categories is counted.
3. The percentage of responses of various categories from the total number of all responses is calculated.
4. Combinations of answers based on formal assessments and assessments by content are identified.
5. The individual characteristics of the tested person and the number of deviations from the norm are determined.
6. A conclusion is drawn about the personality of the test taker.

Interpretation (decoding) of the Rorschach test.

Protocol

Diagnostic indicators
(according to formal estimates - "the value of the Rorschach blot")

C (whole) - a large number of holistic images - an indicator of the ability and desire for integration, observing, covering the type of perception, a synthetic way of thinking, the ability to abstract.

D (detail) - a) a large number of details - an indicator of the "fragmentation" of attention, its narrowness, fragmentation and illogical thinking; b) the perception of white gaps and the construction of images on them - an indicator of negativism or defensive position of the subject.

F (form) - a large number of answers with a predominance of indications of forms: a) an indicator of the domination of thought over feeling; b) an indicator of compensatory phenomena, when by reflection, reasoning "extinguish" or try to extinguish an affect or emotion. In this case, it is possible to diagnose latent fear, anxiety, fear of "dissolving" emotions. A very high percentage of answers F, on the contrary, is an indicator of impulsivity.

Dv (movement) - responses with the discretion of movement - an indicator of the subject's introversive tendencies, an indicator of the wealth and flexibility of the associative process. A sign of independent associative work, often without external impulses.

Color (color) - answers with a high percentage of Color are indicators of a person's capture of affect and emotions. Evidence of the predominance of affective processes over other mental processes. Sign of "narrowed consciousness", impulsivity and lack of control.

Here is a short interpretation of the answers, Rorschach's "blob meanings". A detailed interpretation of the test can be found in the following literature:

Note: The interpretation of the test must be carried out by a specialist, otherwise the results may be invalid.

Rorschach test. Ink stain technique.

4.85 Rating 4.85 (10 Votes)