What is "Russian Spring"? Ukrainian history and Russian Spring Russian spring wiki

There are serious suspicions that the Russian Spring site rusvesna.su is an American provocative project.

The site is high quality. The selection of news is also good, but there are serious disturbing moments.

1. It is absolutely unclear who is behind this site. Category "Contacts" has been absent from recent time.
2. When the heading "Contacts" existed in it, an e-mail address was specified on Gmail.com. Now this address is shown at the bottom of the page. This is an American postal service to which specials have access to Snowden. US services. Naive militias sent news, and after that the United States could have reported on the pro-Russian citizens of the SBU of Ukraine.
3. Pavel Gubarev speaks on his facebrachnaya page that the Ukrainian military was shot under the Volnoveth "right sector", and "Russian Spring" about the fact that militia was made. On behalf of the militia, there is an unknown "who" and gives decisive news in an unsightly form.
4. The site was DDOS attacks. At first glance, this indicates the pro-Russian mood of the site, however, during these attacks, a message was displayed that the site was protected by the American CLOUDFARE service. Then the site admitted that the attack was on hosting, where the site itself is directly located. To find out where this hosting can only have administrative access to CloudFare. DDOS attack was carried out at the time of information uncertainty. At the very moment, the attacks of the Ukrainian media flood the news that the shooters are desperately breaking into Russia, and the militia suffered defeat.
It looks like competent tactics of knocking out urgent valid information about the setting - to make a "Russian spring" by the main resource, and then at the right moment it is turned off to embarrass the militia.
5. The site has never collected any donations to their existence. What does it speak about the funding (?!).
6. One of the headings of the site is called "Uvagi!" (!) And this is on the Russian-Public site !!! According to Ukrainian, this means "attention." This suggests that the site did Ukrainians, and not Russians.

There is another option: site administrators - idiots who trust Western services, but in such simplicity is unbelievable.

The defeat of the National Guard of the Army, Novotroitsk fertile. (Yesterday, contrary to the statements of the junta and the "Russian_Vesna" site, the militia shoots did not retreat and were not surrounded. This is a lie of this site)
Affiliates Volnoveha 22 05 14:

Only it is not clear who the turntables were fired if self defense left the whole? Did the legal advocacy?

And this is the defeat of the National Guard and the Army, Novotroitsk; Fertile ...:

There are less than thousands according to the shooting school. And this is from 7 million inhabitants?!

This is Slavyansk, there are still Donetsk region and the Lugansk region, there are also people too. Now the battles go under Lisichansky this is the Lugansk region. There are tanks in the city of martial law on Lugansk.

Make conclusions yourself. And if something happens to this ... all the wines will lie on the people of the republic and the shame of this will never wash away to you.
Nahapurik: http: //www.Syt/users/4955658/post325340247/
22.05.2014

What is Russian spring? This is the uprising of the Russian and Russian-speaking people in Ukraine against not only the current Maidan-Bandera junta named after Turchinov - Yatsenyuk, but against the entire policy of violent Ukrainization, which lasted all a quarter of a century of uncommon.

Who are Russians? These are Russian and Ukrainians, one people, as a rule, speaking one native language - Russian. Who are Russian-speaking is, for example, the Greeks of Mariupol, two hundred thousand of which for the most part indicate their native language Russian.

What were they rebelled against? Against the design of the Ukrainian Small Empire, in which a small and very aggressive oligarchy, living at the expense of the blackmail of Russia and extortion at the West, and in which there was almost no Ukrainians, supposedly dominated by the Ukrainian part of the citizens of Ukraine over Russian part of it.

This is an uprising against the policy of a genocide, which was not carried out with the help of a machine and a knife, but with the help of a school textbook and sound track in a cinema, was not less deadly.

Already in 1991-2001 Ukraine is incomprehensible where he lost three million Russian people - from 11 to 8 million, which disappeared from the census. They did not move to Russia, they just disappeared. If this is not a genocide, what is the then genocide?

The main tool of anti-Russian terror was shame. Russians were continuously humiliated and made it seems that they were Russian. All Ukrainian history textbooks were built on the listing of those crimes who have committed Russian cats against Ukrainians, as Dmitruk said.

All propaganda was aimed at ensuing Russian, that he is Russian, that he is a swirl Moskal, who does not understand the showing Move, so that he drove his Russian essence as deeply - began to portray what he speaks in which it is impossible to think, hide His Orthodoxy, having hit the phylaretovsky split so that he, soaring in the sides, muttered that he was against separatism and federalism, for the one Cathedral Ukraine.

The feeling of fear provided the SBU - probably the most strange special services of the world, which successfully coped with only two functions: ethnic repressive police and disinformation bureau.

Psychological preparations for the Russian spring went under the slogan "Give all our and cake." Russians are Russian. Ukrainians are Ukrainians. Ukraine has a complete right with a complete neighboring indifference to join even in Europe, at least the United States of Brazil.

But ... in its ethnocultural boundaries. Ukraine cannot kidnap Russian and Russians that constitutes part of the Russian world, the Russian heritage and went to Ukraine solely within the framework of territorial shuffling as part of the USSR. Russians do not claim any imperial domination over Ukrainians and will not suffer Ukrainian imperial domination over Russians.

Such a ruthless surgical approach, one hundred percent Rusocentrism of Russian Spring, became a full shock for Ukrainian chauvinists. And they included the usual hysteria "not brothers you us", hoping to get the usual and expected reaction: "Brothers, brothers, let's live together!" - In order to start blackmail again.

And it turned out something directly the opposite - Russians willingly pick up and emphasize the instructions on the contradictions of two ethnic groups, seeing confirmation of the fact that Russians cannot be the younger "in Ukraine".

In this sense, the fate of the funny poem Anastasia Dmitruk "We will never be brothers" (written, by the way, in Nevratsky).

It was clearly disproportical to his poetic advantages of interest, a kind of delight and a sea of \u200b\u200bresponses in Russia precisely because quite clearly expressed the Russian mood - a complete reluctance to maintain family relationships with the fallen "non-lack of", the desire to emphasize the superiority of the Russian developed city civilization, which is equally Great Mosts, and Maloros were built over the short-sighted farms world "Ukrainian".

The rocking of the Ukrainian side of the topic of "carelessness" and the alienation from the Russians led to self-determination of Russian identity through the denial of Ukrainians.

And the first results of this self-determination were impressive - Russia began to handle the fictional, project Ukraine is cold and impassively. As with the object. No Russians became fuel for Ukrainian National Dinga, and Ukraine became a fertilizer for the flowering of National russian.

Russia is no longer "focused." It comes out of the shores of artificial compression to their natural borders. The air of the Russian spring is drunk and fills the chest delight. I want it to continue.

Germany threatens that supports sanctions against Russia "in the event of the division of Ukraine". Even I will support the sanction against the Russian Federation in the event of the division of Ukraine! Just divide, please.

No need to wise. Divide simply.

Ukraine is Ukraine.

Russia is Russia.

To each his own.

We continue the discussion on the topic "What is Russian Spring", dedicated to the second anniversary of these historical events.

Political and public figures, experts, philosophers, as well as militia, are attracted to our conversation, and the participants of this dramatic process, the essence and importance of which we still have to evaluate.

Russian Spring has already organized a survey of our readers (); We also talked to this topic with the head of the DNR Alexander Zakharchenko, a politician Oleg Tsarev, writer Zakhar Prilepin, publicists Dmitry Olshansky and Alexander Chalenko, a political scientist Oleg Bondarenko.

Russian Spring is a historical world-wide event that denotes the beginning of the end of the post-Soviet period.

The Soviet Union broke out in 1991. His decay is a long process that has not yet completed now, in the tenths.

The union, with several exceptions, decayed exactly internal administrative borders conducted by Namaum, without any logic. Therefore, all new states have encountered the problem of national consolidation and no one coped with it to fully. They could not refuse the Soviet concept of "Title Nation" (more precisely, the "Title Ethnic Group") and formed regimes in which various ethnic and language groups have different volumes of civil rights.

National, more precisely - ethnonational, consolidation in such modes is carried out by the most primitive and hard way: through the extrusion from socio-political life (and in the future - in general from the country) of all who do not relate to the "titular" group. Such a policy will inevitably generate conflict, but in some post-Soviet states it was immediately bought by the possibility of free leaving abroad. After the departure of "Aliens", there was indeed ethnonational consolidation, but if the "neotitule" groups could not or did not want to leave - the conflict potential accumulated.

Why was the inturate conflict so delayed in time? Ukraine received a rich inheritance from the USSR. It entered independence as an industrial country with a developed agrarian sector, which had several consequences. First, the inheritance had to be divided between oligarchic clans, so the problem of ethnonational consolidation has not been on the agenda for a long time, "nonetitular" groups used a certain amount of rights.

Ukraine, by the way, one of the two post-Soviet European states that ratified the charter of regional languages \u200b\u200bor minority languages \u200b\u200b(the second is Armenia).

Secondly, from Industrial Ukraine, it was not necessary to massively leave not earnings - many had the opportunity to work in their homeland, which means that the potential of the conflict did not dissolve due to the outflow of the population, he simply accumulated.

Thirdly, in an industrialized state, and Ukraine is not an exception, many people with modern worldview: engineers, highly skilled workers, scientists. And they, of course, were not the best soil for the implementation of archaic ethnonational projects.

But time passed. Property was divided, reinturalization began. At some point, the ruling group returned to ethnonational consolidation on the basis of the most rigid and archaic methods (among other things, refused to fulfill the charter of regional languages). Ukraine returned to the point of origin of the collapse of the USSR, only without the previous industrial and scientific potential.

"Neotitoral" groups felt the danger, but to freely leave abroad, as the dissatisfied from Latvia and Estonia are leaving, it was impossible - and even unnecessary. And then the accumulated conflict potential was updated. Coming "Russian Spring".

Ukrainian politicians and journalists of nationalist views, and after them and the mass of ordinary citizens who supported Maidan, love to glue on their opponents the labels of "Ukrainophobians", "Ukrainian" labels and haters "all Ukrainian". The Bulgakovsky professor of Preobrazhensky in his famous spher about the "counter-revolution" was given by the description of this unpaid propaganda reception.

In fact, the whole of our imaginary "Ukrainophobia" stems only from sincere living interest to both the culture of Ukraine, and we are experiencing acute dislike for us those who take a caricature charovin or exotic Bandera.

Archetypes of the Ukrainian Bunta

Here, for example, such a bright episode of domestic history, as Kolivshchyna - the uprising of the Cossacks and peasants on the Polish lands of Ukraine in the middle of the XVIII century. Who of the citizens of famous views does not identify themselves with her heroes? At the start of the electoral company to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine in 2012, opposition candidates, priests of the non-Canonical UPC of the Kiev Patriarchate and representatives of the national intelligentsia even conducted in the Cold Yar (Cherkasy region), the ritual of the sanctification of knives, sneezed by Taras Shevchenko in the "Gaidamaki" poem. And in Odessa, one of the most comical characters of the local Euromaidan - Mr. By the name of Gutsalyuk, calls himself no other than the "Ataman of the Black Sea Gaidamatsky Association."

And now let's postpone the Sharovarchina together with the inappropriate in the Nadniprany Ukraine Mashinger. What do we see? The uprising begins with the fact that the Zaporizhia Cossack is touched by the towns and towns and waving the "golden diploma" of the queen of Catherine, and the then "Vatushki" and "Titushki" are enough. I suddenly remembered this episode when I read the status of the famous Moscow publicist Dmitry Olshansky in Facebook that the Russians, unlike Ukrainians, do not cope with their problems without a state. Like, the uprising in Sevastopol without "polite people" would choose the same as the uprising in Donetsk.

"It's funny and sad," Olshansky writes, - that in Ukraine our authorities prevents exactly the property of the Russian people, which helps it in Russia so much. Russians are not sufficiently buzzed. Not because they are good (...). And because there is no order. As the secretarial butcher spoke Nicholas Pavlovich in 1848: you are, the sovereign, only the orders - and we will arrange such a revolution that any-expensive. "

So, in 1768, in order to raise the uprising, the zalizonak such an order falsified! Imagine, it doesn't care, as if Pavel Gubarev, the current Ukrainian political prisoner number 1, read the order of the President of the Russian Federation on Donetsk Square: "Relive and get the power!". From the point of view of the current "Gaidamaks", the real Gaidamak Zaliznyak is a traitor and collaborant, which in the country difficult for the country went to the area under the flag of the "aggressive neighbor." And what happened then? The detachment of the "National Guard" was sent against the traitor and separatist, headed by a genth, so to speak, "clean up order." And he instead did what? Right, changed the oath! Traitor and shame of the Armed Forces of Ukraine! Gangle!

Further more. Catherine, in the end, introduced the troops under the slogan of protecting the humanitarian rights of the uninterests. An occupation! And if you change the "here" and "then" in places, then an unbreakable wall of the Poles deposited in Uman and Gaidamaks, who know what was done with the first two categories of citizens would be to be stood against the Russian army. But in the XVIII century, there was still no Kiev media, so in reality everything came out quite the opposite. Even Gaidamaki, who started all this, could not withstand the regular army of the European sample, which in this part of Europe at that time was only among Russia.

Nerve history

This whole story, our native domestic history and there is a direct analogy with the current return of the Crimea, and not the "Anshalus" and "Munich collusion" at all. Just in order to make this obvious conclusion, you need a little bit of this very native story to know and love.

And what the soil for the analogies gives another key episode of the Ukrainian National History - Khmelnichichina! Bogdan-Zinovy \u200b\u200bKhmelnitsky - It's just a "separatist of the 80 level"! Even the joining of the Soviet Union of Galicia in 1939 lies in the framework of the same historical logic, when the Ukrainian population of "similar jaciers" was exhausted with polonium and patience, the Ukrainian population was optimistic of Soviet.

The main nerve of Ukrainian history is that every time the humanitarian, political and social pressure of the West is completed by a surge of people's wrath and the arrival of more or less polite, but always well-armed with the northeast. And according to the result, the territory covered by the uprising is completely or partially included in Russia. That is why the real historical heirs of the hinticuls and coliivshys are not impoverished rummy clowns, but the current popular uprising of the Ukrainian southeast, which has already been called "Russian Spring".